Please note: All new registrants to the Panopto Community Forum must be approved by a forum moderator or admin. As such, if you navigate to a feature that is members-only, you may receive an error page if your registration has not yet been approved. We apologize for any inconvenience and are approving new members as quickly as possible.
At Panopto, we love how committed our customers are to making Panopto a better product - please feel free to share your feature ideas or vote on existing ideas in this category!
Before submitting a feature request, make sure to read our Guidelines & Expectations post
Once your idea is submitted, it will be marked as 'Tracked' when added to our internal feature requests system.
Before submitting a feature request, make sure to read our Guidelines & Expectations post
Once your idea is submitted, it will be marked as 'Tracked' when added to our internal feature requests system.
Options
Retention Policy to include "AND" statements
Bob Eastman
Crackerjack
When creating a retention policy, it would be really helpful for our institution if the policy rules could audit two rules together, instead of separately.
Example: Delete anything that was created more than five years ago AND hasn't been viewed in more than a year.
Right now, these two policies rules don't work together, and the audit captures everything that falls into either category. Are we the only institution needing this? I also wonder how institutions are working around this current complication?
Tagged:
6
Comments
We implemented a policy that removes content that has been unused for four consecutive years, and it has been working well for us over the last year. I totally see that there is a need for more granularity in some situations, but we elected to keep it simple, and we will probably keep that.
Hello,
thank you for your comments.
AND / OR statements for content retention policies will follow shortly with the next update to 11.1.
Best
Evelin